Communication Analyzer
Analyze communication patterns across text messages and emails to identify coordinated denial, manipulation, and gaslighting. Produces exhibit-formatted tables with timestamps for counsel review.
In practice: When they gaslight you — this documents the pattern so a judge can see it.
What problem it solves
High-conflict cases often produce huge message histories. The Communication Analyzer is meant to cluster threads, flag repeated contradictions, and output exhibit-style tables with timestamps and speakers—so a trier of fact can see patterns, not cherry-picked snippets. Privacy and safety constraints mean verified handling may apply for raw uploads.
Who it is for
Litigants and advocates managing large communication records who need defensible summaries—not vibes.
What you need before starting
- Lawful access to the communications you are analyzing.
- Clear understanding that outputs require human review before court use.
Step-by-step (condensed)
This listing uses a shorter checklist. A full six-part guide (needs, uploads, automation, review, outputs, when to stop) ships first on the three “available” launch tools.
- 1
Collect exports from your phone or email per instructions (coming with launch).
- 2
Upload into the analyzer when available.
- 3
Review flagged patterns and remove anything privileged or irrelevant.
- 4
Work with counsel on how to introduce exhibits in your jurisdiction.
Deployment and how it runs
Technical sequence (for operators)
- 01Export messages in a supported format (scope TBD at launch).
- 02Define date range and participants.
- 03Run pattern analysis and review automated flags as hypotheses, not conclusions.
- 04Export exhibit tables for review with counsel.
Example outputs and proof
- Timestamped exhibit table (speaker, date, excerpt).
- Thread-level summary of contradictory statements.
No separate preformatted sample—bullets above describe output shape; redacted excerpts may ship later.
Visual proof
No wireframe or screenshot is attached to this listing yet—honest gap, not a hidden demo.
Limitations and safety boundaries
- Not legal advice; admissibility depends on jurisdiction and authentication rules.
- May require verified upload path for sensitive threads.
- Full UX and screenshots: launch blocker—not yet available.
Public vs verified vs compute-limited
Not released yet. This listing is public so you know what we are building. Shipping timeline and access limits will be documented here. Nora's Law is a platform and framework—not legislation. These are software tools, not votes or statutes.
Public tools stay public first. Join is for trust, heavier workflows, and collaboration—not a substitute for counsel.
Public tools require public support. Fund Public Access →